A Cyberspace Experience: Final Project
For most individuals in their teens, twenty-somethings and thirty-somethings, the computer holds very few brand new experiences. They’ve grown up in a “techy” world and with few exceptions, the computer and its various components reign supreme as an integral part of their entertainment system. Most people in this age group have experienced, or will, at some time in their lives, tap into many of the diverse facets that the Internet of today has to offer. This experience is referred to as: Web 2.0.
In the beginning, there was Web 1.0. It was characterized by “pages” which displayed text or an image—one image. To change the page, the user clicked. No click, no change. There was email. In the very beginning, it was used by the military to transfer data. Paul Baran, the originator, and the RAND Corporation introduced the system which was used as an emergency communication system in case of nuclear attack; surviving communities could keep in touch without enemy forces tracking the survivors. At this time the system was known as ARPANET (Sterling, 1993). The system was also used to transfer data from place to place and computer to computer. It was simple and faster than sending messages through the post office (Snailmail).
As the messaging system grew in popularity, the public discovered it and began using it to send more than the originally intended work-related messages. People found that personal data could be transmitted faster and easier than having to write-and-send or even to use the telephone. Voile—email was born. As ARPANET grew and evolved, it was given a new name in 1989: the Internet, as it came to be known by its users, grew at an astounding rate; no longer just a conduit of data between three or four computers but a complex system connecting thousands of computers and their users together. (Origins of the ARPANET, 2006). This was Web 1.0, and it was characterized by viewing, book marking, and printing—fun, informative, and communicative for web visitors in the 1980’s and 90’s. (Carmean, 2008).
Entering the Web 2.0 era (Web 2.0 is a Web 1.0 on steroids!), everything that was, is now bigger, better, faster, glitzier. Web 1.0 users paid for software products to enhance their web browsing experiences while Web 2.0 paid for the services which the browser provided. This was much easier and users didn’t have to rely on installing anything or getting past glitches which might occur between their computers and the software programs. Also, with websites giving users the same type of information, it freed the site visitors to make personal changes that accommodated individual preferences. Social networking to the Web 1.0 user was logging on to a BBS (Bulletin Board System) or the Usenet where a group or individual poses a topic or question and fellow site visitors can post comments; on the Web 2.0, social networking takes the form of blogging where users establish personal web pages that profile the page’s “owner”, and its content run from insights, to personal grievances, to blowing off steam at whatever or whomever, to scholarly dissertations with cited resources; whatever “tweaks” the page owner’s proverbial “whistle”; virtually, anything goes. These blogs can contain images, videos, and even links to other blog sites. (Wikipedia, 2008). Unlike some Usenet groups or particular BBS’s, a potential site visitor does not have to be approved in order to post comments to a blog. Some examples of sites where bloggers can set up their pages are Blogger.com, Blogspot, and many other specific sites which offer blog spaces such as MySpace and FaceBook.
In addition to “blogging” on the Internet, Web 2.0 also introduced a spin-off service in which users could transfer blogs, information, thoughts and feelings to other users’ cell phones (mobile blogging). Current activities, updated information on blogs, and other types of messages can be transmitted through services such as Twitter. Activities associated with services such as Twitter are known as mini- or micro-blogging and utilizes the instant messaging system. My personal blog is: http://tinyurl.com/3mbg2q.
Email was an element of Web 1.0 that initially drew people to participate in online activity. In Web 2.0, browsers such as MSN added “Live” to their repertoire of services (Windows Live Hotmail); with this feature, users sign up for the service, make a lists of other user friends who also belong to the service and are notified when these friends/members are logged in (on the Net and may be available to converse). Through a process called IRC (Internet Relay Chat), members can chat—reply and respond, instantaneously to each other, just as they would in real/face-to-face dialogs. This is one of the most popular facets of Web 2.0 technology; it was one of the main reasons why Web 2.0 flourishes today. (Learnthat, 2004).
Web 1.0 offered users a tool which enabled them to remember which sites they visited and wished to re-visit again by “book marking” it; some such sites were Mosaic and Opera (now, rarely used). Web 2.0 now offers its users a tool called the “weblog” so that they can “pool” frequently used websites of a common interest. These shared book-marking sites such as del.icio.us, Ma. gnolia, Reddit, and FURL enable users to view sites that other members have stored and can access websites that pertain to their interests or needs without having to research the sites for themselves. I have a FURL account which is:
Another Web 2.0 feature that goes hand-in-hand with these social book marks is a tool known as a “tag.” Tagging involves assigning personal words to describe a site or file which will enable the user to recognize it later when they want to re-visit or need the information which the file or site contains. When these “tags” are linked together with other sites such as other blogs or webpages, it is referred to as a “folksonomy classification. Web tools such as Flickr teach users the use of tags and how to apply them to their files and pages. Other sites such as del.icio.us have tagging tools within the site to help members utilize the tagging process. (Wikipedia, 2008).
Web 2.0 is also known for a synchronizing feed which allows information and webpages to be automatically and periodically updated. This is an irreplaceable feature from Web 1.0’s static pages. This feature has unlimited uses in the Web 2.0 environment. The feed is known as RSS (Really Simple Syndication) feed and its function is to update and replace information on constantly changing sites such as news web pages, business sites, and weblogs. Users can subscribe to various sites that contain an RSS feed, knowing that the information that they receive will be current and up-to-date as much as is possible. For all of the above mentioned features, there is a fun, entertaining side of the Web 2.0 technology.
Virtual role playing is a common and popular activity in the Web 2.0 environment. Though not for everyone, sites such as 2nd Life, IMVU, and Teen 2nd Life, take visitors on a trip into a virtual reality community where they can be anyone or anything that their little hearts desire; they are only limited by their imaginations. They create their own personas and can wander anywhere in the world, universe or unworldly place that they can imagine. They can shop in retail stores, purchase items with imaginary money (Linden Dollars) which have to be earned, or purchase items with real money (credit card must be on file with the service). “Residents” may own property, their own residences, and even businesses (where, just like in real life, there is money to be made). Created personas are known as “avatars” and can walk, drive a vehicle, or fly. They can travel to exotic places and meet other “residents.” It is a social community and conversation utilizes the RSS feeds so individuals can interact much as they would in a real-life situation. There are some situations that may not be appropriate for everyone, however so be warned.
Another verb that might describe Web 2.0 is “sharing.” If any word appropriately fits this technology, it is “sharing” because the entire environment has been designed around the social aspect of user communities. Powerful tools designed to enable users to view, share, upload/download images and videos produced for exactly that purpose, fill web spaces. (Wikipedia, 2008). Websites such as YouTube, Google Video, eyespot, ourmedia, and others allow users to view and share images and videos. Members may upload or download these images and videos to keep in their folders or share with others. Videos are produced to share opinions or make statements or just to be entertaining. (DVgurus, 2006 ).
“Enterprising” is definitely a word that can be used in the same context as Web 2.0. This technology was actually designed to accommodate e-commerce on the Web. Advertisements line browser pages and no one seems to be exempt from the banners and pop-ups which appear relentlessly on most web pages. The only places that seem void of advertisements are blogs and other personal pages such as YouTube.
All-in-all, Web 2.0 is growing exponentially year–by-year. Its popularity has not diminished but continues to increase, improve, and evolve. Who would have believed that a simple message-transferring system could one day have billions of users, worldwide, and become the very foundation for global commerce around the world. This, then, is the Web 2.0 technology.
References
DVgurus. Ten video services compared.http://www.dvguru.com/2006/04/07/ten-video-sharing-services-compared/
Introduction of second life. (2007). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b72CvvMuD6Q
Learnthat. (2004). IRC definition.http://www.learnthat.com/define/view.asp?id=104
Origins of the ARPANET., 2008, from http://www.geeks.com/techtips/2006/techtips26nov06.html
Sterling, B. A short history of the internet by bruce sterling.http://www.library.yale.edu/div/instruct/internet/history.htm
TechWeb Network. (2007). Twitter.http://www.techweb.com/encyclopedia/defineterm.jhtml?term=Twitter
Wikipedia. Blog.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blog
Wikipedia. Internet bookmark.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bookmark_manager
Wikipedia. Second life.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Life
Wikipedia. Tag (metadata).http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tag_(metadata)
Wikipedia. Web 2.0.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2
Wikipedia. YouTube.22 April 2008
Friday, April 25, 2008
Sunday, April 13, 2008
RSS: Does What?
RSS: Does What?
(http://tinyurl.com/3rcrm5)
For those of us Internet “newbies” that have no idea what an “RSS” is or how it makes our lives easier, trust me, we need this process. To our younger counterparts, RSS documents are taken for granted and are a common-knowledge piece of data. In a nutshell, RSS- “Really Simple Syndication”- technology came about in 1999 and are formats which enable websites to automatically update information as it becomes available. A very important aspect to such sites as news- and discussion groups, blog sites, business advertisers, and other similar sites which require information to be periodically updated or changed. (Wikipedia, 2008).
Wikipedia reports that RSS documents are read through certain software called “readers” or more specifically, “feed readers” (a.k.a. aggregators ). This special software program is linked to documents and when a user clicks on the RSS button, the reader scans and uploads any new data that is found which relates to the specific site. This enables a site to have the most current information available to date. (Wikipedia, 2008).
Until I took this class, I had no idea that there was such a device as an RSS link to documents, much less how it worked. I was a little intimidated after reading several articles about the history and description of an RSS until I was able to set up my own account. In the back of my mind, I understood what the program was supposed to do; the job it was supposed to perform but I didn’t realize how easy it was to set up or how important it is to have an RSS linked to a document. It is essential to any website or any web page which involves changing information or data on an ongoing basis. To me, it is mind-boggling to think that if there were no such formatting process, a technician or programmer would have to manually change and update the information on websites and web pages. It would be so labor-intensive, such sites would be prohibitive to maintain.
What is RSS? RSS Explained (2007) describes RSS as a “problem solver” for users by enabling a website to constantly update information and content to that site. By linking a user to websites such as Google Reader, Amphetadesk, FeedReader, NewsGater, My Yahoo, and Bloglines, an individual need not go to individual sites or have to sign in whenever visiting their favorite web pages, which adds to the privacy factor for the user. The article states that the RSS feature allows sites, such as Google Pages or other feed readers, as was mentioned earlier, to access all or most of a user’s favorite, regularly visited sites from one location, at a finger’s touch.
An interesting webpage that gives descriptive terminology for RSS is RSS 2.0 at Harvard Law. The address is: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/rss/rss.html. The article gives users an idea of RSS is all about and what related terms mean to those not well-versed in the RSS technology (newbies, like myself, are pretty clueless when it comes to these more complicated elements of the Net. We need all the help we can get!). It also gives some examples of the link. (RSS 2.0 at Harvard Law). The article explains how the RSS format evolves from the original RDF format and adds new elements such as namespaces and is modular. RSS 2.0 explains that the forerunner, RSS 1.0, still carried the RDF header but actually was in a totally different format. (RSS 2.0 at Harvard Law).
An example of an RSS feed website is The New York Times webpage. It can be found at: http://www.nytimes.com/services/xml/rss/index.html, NYTimes.com. It features news items found in the real time news addition of its newspaper. The website is continually updating its articles and utilizes the RSS 2.0 edition on the website. (NYTimes.com,2007). Other sites and pages which utilize this addition of the RSS feed are, as previously mentioned, pages such as Google Reader, which was my choice. I am not familiar with any other feed reader so I chose this reader because it was a preference of my instructor’s.
Services such as Google Reader utilize the RSS link to make re-visitation to sites and sharing of favorite sites, as easy as a simple selection and click; that those sites will automatically be updated with currant information. I had no problem setting up an account and subscribing to some websites but I will admit that my comprehension (beyond understanding that this program element updates information and links to “feed readers” such as Google Reader which allow a user to access favorite or frequently-used sites from one location without having to sign in to the individual sites) is sorely lacking when it comes to understanding exactly how RSS works. Learning to navigate Web 2.0 and its various components such as RSS 2.0 is very challenging and will be fun when I get a little more experience with it.
References
RSS.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSS_(file_format)
RSS. (2007). http://www.nytimes.com/services/xml/rss/index.html
RSS 2.0 at harvard law.http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/rss/rss.html
What is RSS? RSS explained. (26 July 2007). www.WhatIsRSS.com
(http://tinyurl.com/3rcrm5)
For those of us Internet “newbies” that have no idea what an “RSS” is or how it makes our lives easier, trust me, we need this process. To our younger counterparts, RSS documents are taken for granted and are a common-knowledge piece of data. In a nutshell, RSS- “Really Simple Syndication”- technology came about in 1999 and are formats which enable websites to automatically update information as it becomes available. A very important aspect to such sites as news- and discussion groups, blog sites, business advertisers, and other similar sites which require information to be periodically updated or changed. (Wikipedia, 2008).
Wikipedia reports that RSS documents are read through certain software called “readers” or more specifically, “feed readers” (a.k.a. aggregators ). This special software program is linked to documents and when a user clicks on the RSS button, the reader scans and uploads any new data that is found which relates to the specific site. This enables a site to have the most current information available to date. (Wikipedia, 2008).
Until I took this class, I had no idea that there was such a device as an RSS link to documents, much less how it worked. I was a little intimidated after reading several articles about the history and description of an RSS until I was able to set up my own account. In the back of my mind, I understood what the program was supposed to do; the job it was supposed to perform but I didn’t realize how easy it was to set up or how important it is to have an RSS linked to a document. It is essential to any website or any web page which involves changing information or data on an ongoing basis. To me, it is mind-boggling to think that if there were no such formatting process, a technician or programmer would have to manually change and update the information on websites and web pages. It would be so labor-intensive, such sites would be prohibitive to maintain.
What is RSS? RSS Explained (2007) describes RSS as a “problem solver” for users by enabling a website to constantly update information and content to that site. By linking a user to websites such as Google Reader, Amphetadesk, FeedReader, NewsGater, My Yahoo, and Bloglines, an individual need not go to individual sites or have to sign in whenever visiting their favorite web pages, which adds to the privacy factor for the user. The article states that the RSS feature allows sites, such as Google Pages or other feed readers, as was mentioned earlier, to access all or most of a user’s favorite, regularly visited sites from one location, at a finger’s touch.
An interesting webpage that gives descriptive terminology for RSS is RSS 2.0 at Harvard Law. The address is: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/rss/rss.html. The article gives users an idea of RSS is all about and what related terms mean to those not well-versed in the RSS technology (newbies, like myself, are pretty clueless when it comes to these more complicated elements of the Net. We need all the help we can get!). It also gives some examples of the link. (RSS 2.0 at Harvard Law). The article explains how the RSS format evolves from the original RDF format and adds new elements such as namespaces and is modular. RSS 2.0 explains that the forerunner, RSS 1.0, still carried the RDF header but actually was in a totally different format. (RSS 2.0 at Harvard Law).
An example of an RSS feed website is The New York Times webpage. It can be found at: http://www.nytimes.com/services/xml/rss/index.html, NYTimes.com. It features news items found in the real time news addition of its newspaper. The website is continually updating its articles and utilizes the RSS 2.0 edition on the website. (NYTimes.com,2007). Other sites and pages which utilize this addition of the RSS feed are, as previously mentioned, pages such as Google Reader, which was my choice. I am not familiar with any other feed reader so I chose this reader because it was a preference of my instructor’s.
Services such as Google Reader utilize the RSS link to make re-visitation to sites and sharing of favorite sites, as easy as a simple selection and click; that those sites will automatically be updated with currant information. I had no problem setting up an account and subscribing to some websites but I will admit that my comprehension (beyond understanding that this program element updates information and links to “feed readers” such as Google Reader which allow a user to access favorite or frequently-used sites from one location without having to sign in to the individual sites) is sorely lacking when it comes to understanding exactly how RSS works. Learning to navigate Web 2.0 and its various components such as RSS 2.0 is very challenging and will be fun when I get a little more experience with it.
References
RSS.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSS_(file_format)
RSS. (2007). http://www.nytimes.com/services/xml/rss/index.html
RSS 2.0 at harvard law.http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/rss/rss.html
What is RSS? RSS explained. (26 July 2007). www.WhatIsRSS.com
Sunday, April 6, 2008
Living a Second Life
This is a picture of my avatar named Laine Kassner. If you see me, please stop and say “Hi”—I’m in Mexico right now.
Living a Second Life
Many of the younger friends that I have been privileged to meet on campus since re-starting my scholastic experience, participate, or have participated, in the Internet’s virtual community called Second Life (SL, to practiced participants).
Wikipedia relates that Linden Lab (a.k.a. Linden Research, Inc.) designed a program in 2003 (although it wasn’t recognized world-wide until 2006-07), that featured a life-like, virtual city where site visitors could “live” and socially interact with each other. Activities are much the same as in real life; individuals can walk or operate vehicles of various types; they can explore individually or participate in group experiences; they can buy a residence or own a business; virtual business owners can sell or trade their products and services to other owners or residents by exchanging Linden Dollars (L$), though other transactions such as buying property or joining online forums require real life currency such as credit cards. (Wikipedia, 2008).
The attraction to sites such as Second Life is that the virtual personas of an individual may be similar or totally different from the real life person. For additional fees, a person may create alternate personas that react differently in different social situations. A normally shy, real world person may create an avatar (virtual person) that is outgoing or dashing; a “player” or the “life of any party.” These avatars may possess super human powers which enable them to fly from destination to destination without means of a plane. (Wikipedia, 2008).
Wikipedia also states that the chat feature is another very popular aspect of the program, allowing the residents to interact freely with one another and enabling relationships to occur. Another dimension of this feature is global communication through instantaneous messaging (IM) which is more effective since communicators don’t need to be within a certain distance of those with whom they are trying to converse. Also, conversation is conducted on a private, one-to-one or within a group, basis and won’t include those not directly involved. (Wikipedia, 2008).
To see a visual introduction to Second Life, go to YouTube at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b72CvvMuD6Q
In all of my 50+ years, I have never experienced anything close to Second Life—what a hoot (awesome, cool, tight—however you want to phrase it)! It was fun after I learned how to walk, drive (only squished 2 little rodents and 1 fellow avatar, thank you very much!), and fly (could you ever imagine you would fly like that?!?). This was an enjoyable experience for me. I don’t have much free time and I’m not sure I would spend very much time with that program but it was enjoyable while I was there. I also enjoyed the social interaction on Help Island; it was quite amusing to watch others perform as clumsily as I, myself, did. I met some nice people there—I hope you were one of them. Maybe I’ll see you there, sometime. My avatar is a chubby girl in red top and grey Capri pants. Stop and talk to me, I’d love to chat. Here is my picture.
Many of the younger friends that I have been privileged to meet on campus since re-starting my scholastic experience, participate, or have participated, in the Internet’s virtual community called Second Life (SL, to practiced participants).
Wikipedia relates that Linden Lab (a.k.a. Linden Research, Inc.) designed a program in 2003 (although it wasn’t recognized world-wide until 2006-07), that featured a life-like, virtual city where site visitors could “live” and socially interact with each other. Activities are much the same as in real life; individuals can walk or operate vehicles of various types; they can explore individually or participate in group experiences; they can buy a residence or own a business; virtual business owners can sell or trade their products and services to other owners or residents by exchanging Linden Dollars (L$), though other transactions such as buying property or joining online forums require real life currency such as credit cards. (Wikipedia, 2008).
The attraction to sites such as Second Life is that the virtual personas of an individual may be similar or totally different from the real life person. For additional fees, a person may create alternate personas that react differently in different social situations. A normally shy, real world person may create an avatar (virtual person) that is outgoing or dashing; a “player” or the “life of any party.” These avatars may possess super human powers which enable them to fly from destination to destination without means of a plane. (Wikipedia, 2008).
Wikipedia also states that the chat feature is another very popular aspect of the program, allowing the residents to interact freely with one another and enabling relationships to occur. Another dimension of this feature is global communication through instantaneous messaging (IM) which is more effective since communicators don’t need to be within a certain distance of those with whom they are trying to converse. Also, conversation is conducted on a private, one-to-one or within a group, basis and won’t include those not directly involved. (Wikipedia, 2008).
To see a visual introduction to Second Life, go to YouTube at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b72CvvMuD6Q
In all of my 50+ years, I have never experienced anything close to Second Life—what a hoot (awesome, cool, tight—however you want to phrase it)! It was fun after I learned how to walk, drive (only squished 2 little rodents and 1 fellow avatar, thank you very much!), and fly (could you ever imagine you would fly like that?!?). This was an enjoyable experience for me. I don’t have much free time and I’m not sure I would spend very much time with that program but it was enjoyable while I was there. I also enjoyed the social interaction on Help Island; it was quite amusing to watch others perform as clumsily as I, myself, did. I met some nice people there—I hope you were one of them. Maybe I’ll see you there, sometime. My avatar is a chubby girl in red top and grey Capri pants. Stop and talk to me, I’d love to chat. Here is my picture.
Although Wikipedia states that SL is not a game (it doesn’t have an outcome, there are no losses or wins, violence and/or foul language are not to be tolerated, and destruction of life is not a goal to be sought on any level), it certainly felt close to one, in my eyes. (Wikipedia, 2008). I found it amusing and entertaining.
References
Introduction of second life. (2007). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b72CvvMuD6Q
Wikipedia. Second life.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Life
References
Introduction of second life. (2007). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b72CvvMuD6Q
Wikipedia. Second life.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Life
Sunday, March 2, 2008
Do You FURL?
Wikipedia describes FURL (File Uniform Resource Locators) as a “free, social book marking website that allows members to store workable copies of web pages and share them with others.”
This website was a dream child of Mike Giles who founded it in 2003.
When a user signs up for membership, they are given a 5 gigabyte storage area in which to store favorite web pages; these can be easily and efficiently accessed in several ways: by date, tagging (book-marking), rating, and/or through keywords. Since the web pages are privately archived (but can also be shared), the user can attach comments, opinions, or annotate the way he or she prefers. Information or web pages can also be imported or exported from the furl site.
Users can archive web pages, article clippings, images, notes and comments, and popular URL’s which are pertinent to the user’s groups. Other users may view and share these lists unless a specific item is copyrighted, which, in that case, only the user of the FURL will be allowed to view and comment on that particular item. Other users may view an individual’s furl account and may, if the user allows it, post comments, edit, or add other information to the account. In cases such as these, a user will be notified that information has been added to his/her furl.
A feature of this type of archiving web site is the ease with which a user can find and access his/her web pages of choice/interest. These pages can be found by day, week, month or topic, thus making it a versatile and efficient tool in a business environment as well as for personal use.
One other feature is particularly beneficial to users is that FURL automatically generate a list, based on the accumulated web pages, of websites which are associated with, or have a similar interest as the archived material. This is useful and significant as it may save “searching time.”
A problem with the archiving feature is that images embedded in an article will not be stored with the html in which it was written; also, the images (not the text) may disappear from the site after a period of time. Other problems persist with the site.
When displaying the furl archive, listed items won’t appear in any specific order; nor can any type of order (be requested). During high-request periods, performance problems also exist. They have intermittently occurred during 2006 and into 2007. (Wikipedia, 2008).
A user which subscribes to both FURL and another book marking service, del.icio.us, states that he prefers FURL because his web pages are saved and when the information disappears, he can retrieve the original information; del.icio.us doe not have this feature. (Social Bookmarking Tools, 2008)
I feel that book-marking services such as FURL will continue to increase and improve as the global internet community expands; since it increases speed, efficiency and ease-of-use to people through categorizing, archiving, organizing and enabling others to view, share, and add to subscriber accounts, there is no limitation to the need for such sites in both the professional and personal lives of current and future internet users.
To view my FURL account, please feel free to look and comment (since this is my first experience with a book-marking service, I haven’t had time to add to my list yet). Anyway, here it is:
http://furl.net/my/archive
References
Top 100 tools: Furl. (2008). http://www.c4lpt.co.uk/Top100Tools/furl.html
Wikipedia. (30 January 2008). Furl.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furl
Wikipedia describes FURL (File Uniform Resource Locators) as a “free, social book marking website that allows members to store workable copies of web pages and share them with others.”
This website was a dream child of Mike Giles who founded it in 2003.
When a user signs up for membership, they are given a 5 gigabyte storage area in which to store favorite web pages; these can be easily and efficiently accessed in several ways: by date, tagging (book-marking), rating, and/or through keywords. Since the web pages are privately archived (but can also be shared), the user can attach comments, opinions, or annotate the way he or she prefers. Information or web pages can also be imported or exported from the furl site.
Users can archive web pages, article clippings, images, notes and comments, and popular URL’s which are pertinent to the user’s groups. Other users may view and share these lists unless a specific item is copyrighted, which, in that case, only the user of the FURL will be allowed to view and comment on that particular item. Other users may view an individual’s furl account and may, if the user allows it, post comments, edit, or add other information to the account. In cases such as these, a user will be notified that information has been added to his/her furl.
A feature of this type of archiving web site is the ease with which a user can find and access his/her web pages of choice/interest. These pages can be found by day, week, month or topic, thus making it a versatile and efficient tool in a business environment as well as for personal use.
One other feature is particularly beneficial to users is that FURL automatically generate a list, based on the accumulated web pages, of websites which are associated with, or have a similar interest as the archived material. This is useful and significant as it may save “searching time.”
A problem with the archiving feature is that images embedded in an article will not be stored with the html in which it was written; also, the images (not the text) may disappear from the site after a period of time. Other problems persist with the site.
When displaying the furl archive, listed items won’t appear in any specific order; nor can any type of order (be requested). During high-request periods, performance problems also exist. They have intermittently occurred during 2006 and into 2007. (Wikipedia, 2008).
A user which subscribes to both FURL and another book marking service, del.icio.us, states that he prefers FURL because his web pages are saved and when the information disappears, he can retrieve the original information; del.icio.us doe not have this feature. (Social Bookmarking Tools, 2008)
I feel that book-marking services such as FURL will continue to increase and improve as the global internet community expands; since it increases speed, efficiency and ease-of-use to people through categorizing, archiving, organizing and enabling others to view, share, and add to subscriber accounts, there is no limitation to the need for such sites in both the professional and personal lives of current and future internet users.
To view my FURL account, please feel free to look and comment (since this is my first experience with a book-marking service, I haven’t had time to add to my list yet). Anyway, here it is:
http://furl.net/my/archive
References
Top 100 tools: Furl. (2008). http://www.c4lpt.co.uk/Top100Tools/furl.html
Wikipedia. (30 January 2008). Furl.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furl
Thursday, February 28, 2008
YouTube: An Icon for Web 2.0
YouTube: An Icon for Web 2.0
Wikipedia describes Web 2.0 as being a “trend in the World Wide Web technology” which encompass such elements as: sites for social networking (other sites are: emailing, blogging, wikis, newsgroups, etc.) and other services that help: creating web-pages, web-hosting, designing, or creating group-gathering “rooms”; users socialize, debate, discuss, analyze, or share information. (Web 2.0, 2008).
One of the components of Web 2.0, though not one of the newest features, is YouTube. This site enables users to share videos. Wikipedia’s description of YouTube is a “website where users can upload, view, and share video clips”; it goes on to cite that the site was started in 2005 by three people employed by a company which eventually became part of “eBay.” The website became wildly popular, featuring a wide variety of film clips from movies, TV, and personal content.
People who subscribe to the service are permitted to upload the clips; non-subscribers are permitted to view and share clips but not upload them. Some clips are restricted; videos with questionable content can only be viewed, shared or uploaded by those individuals who are at least 18 years of age. Though not restricted from being posted, pornography or those clips which may contain offensive material are prohibited from being uploaded from the site.
Wikipedia reports that in June of 2006, over 2 billion videos were watched in that month, alone, and 50,000 more were added per day in May 2006; that number increased to 65,000 (per day) by July of that year.
In August of 2006, the Wall Street Journal reported that YouTube boasted a half million subscribers and had an impressive showing of over six million videos. (Wikipedia, 2008).
what-is-what.com states that as of 2007, the video-hosting website is one of the ten most popular sites on the Internet and says that YouTube has 20 million users, most of which are teens and young adults. This article reports that though most of the videos are of amateur quality and content, large companies and corporations such as CBS, Sony, Universal, and Warner are allowing YouTube to license copyrighted material from them.
This article also brings out the point that although the website tries to ban pornographic content, videos of questionable and morally objectionable clips do make it on the marquee. For this reason, the website has been banned from some countries (Turkey, India, and Brazil are just a few), along with many schools and libraries. (what-is-what.com, 2008).
YouTube is known to many of the “Gen X’ers”, virtually all of the Millenials” and is still a thing of “awe and wonder” to a majority of us “Baby Boomers.” I’ll admit that my knowledge of this website was extremely limited, though I confess that a few good friends of mine found it and are completely enamored of it—some have even submitted personal clips! Yikes! I had heard of the site but hadn’t spent much time there since my first experience involved amateurish home videos of late teens or early twenty-something’s getting extremely drunk and falling off sofas—not my “thing”, if you know what I mean (actually, one young man shook a bottle of soda and stuck the open end up his nose, laughing hysterically as the bubbly stuff shot up into his brain and exited through his other nostril; a note here: if I had been in his place, my brain would have exploded and there would have been no material for the film clip—end of story. And I guarantee that there would have been very little humor on my part). For this reason, I chose to give this site another peek, just to confirm or refute the impression I formed after my first experience.
When visiting this site, I watched videos on how to do salsa dancing, belly dancing (3 types of “the shimmy” (I’d be in bed for a week after attempting any of the 3), how to balance 2 forks on a toothpick from the lip of a glass, and how to make a toothpick star from a collection of toothpicks and a drop of water. Although I enjoyed the videos, I often do not have the time to sift through and select clips that would interest me.
The link to my annotated bibliography is:
http://tinyurl.com/2nzuak
References
What is YouTube?http://what-is-what.com/what_is/youtube.htm
Wikipedia. YouTube.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube
Wikipedia. (2008). Web 2.0.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2
Wikipedia describes Web 2.0 as being a “trend in the World Wide Web technology” which encompass such elements as: sites for social networking (other sites are: emailing, blogging, wikis, newsgroups, etc.) and other services that help: creating web-pages, web-hosting, designing, or creating group-gathering “rooms”; users socialize, debate, discuss, analyze, or share information. (Web 2.0, 2008).
One of the components of Web 2.0, though not one of the newest features, is YouTube. This site enables users to share videos. Wikipedia’s description of YouTube is a “website where users can upload, view, and share video clips”; it goes on to cite that the site was started in 2005 by three people employed by a company which eventually became part of “eBay.” The website became wildly popular, featuring a wide variety of film clips from movies, TV, and personal content.
People who subscribe to the service are permitted to upload the clips; non-subscribers are permitted to view and share clips but not upload them. Some clips are restricted; videos with questionable content can only be viewed, shared or uploaded by those individuals who are at least 18 years of age. Though not restricted from being posted, pornography or those clips which may contain offensive material are prohibited from being uploaded from the site.
Wikipedia reports that in June of 2006, over 2 billion videos were watched in that month, alone, and 50,000 more were added per day in May 2006; that number increased to 65,000 (per day) by July of that year.
In August of 2006, the Wall Street Journal reported that YouTube boasted a half million subscribers and had an impressive showing of over six million videos. (Wikipedia, 2008).
what-is-what.com states that as of 2007, the video-hosting website is one of the ten most popular sites on the Internet and says that YouTube has 20 million users, most of which are teens and young adults. This article reports that though most of the videos are of amateur quality and content, large companies and corporations such as CBS, Sony, Universal, and Warner are allowing YouTube to license copyrighted material from them.
This article also brings out the point that although the website tries to ban pornographic content, videos of questionable and morally objectionable clips do make it on the marquee. For this reason, the website has been banned from some countries (Turkey, India, and Brazil are just a few), along with many schools and libraries. (what-is-what.com, 2008).
YouTube is known to many of the “Gen X’ers”, virtually all of the Millenials” and is still a thing of “awe and wonder” to a majority of us “Baby Boomers.” I’ll admit that my knowledge of this website was extremely limited, though I confess that a few good friends of mine found it and are completely enamored of it—some have even submitted personal clips! Yikes! I had heard of the site but hadn’t spent much time there since my first experience involved amateurish home videos of late teens or early twenty-something’s getting extremely drunk and falling off sofas—not my “thing”, if you know what I mean (actually, one young man shook a bottle of soda and stuck the open end up his nose, laughing hysterically as the bubbly stuff shot up into his brain and exited through his other nostril; a note here: if I had been in his place, my brain would have exploded and there would have been no material for the film clip—end of story. And I guarantee that there would have been very little humor on my part). For this reason, I chose to give this site another peek, just to confirm or refute the impression I formed after my first experience.
When visiting this site, I watched videos on how to do salsa dancing, belly dancing (3 types of “the shimmy” (I’d be in bed for a week after attempting any of the 3), how to balance 2 forks on a toothpick from the lip of a glass, and how to make a toothpick star from a collection of toothpicks and a drop of water. Although I enjoyed the videos, I often do not have the time to sift through and select clips that would interest me.
The link to my annotated bibliography is:
http://tinyurl.com/2nzuak
References
What is YouTube?http://what-is-what.com/what_is/youtube.htm
Wikipedia. YouTube.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube
Wikipedia. (2008). Web 2.0.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2
Friday, February 22, 2008
A Usenet Experience
A Usenet, Experience
As an “Older-Something” person and an admitted member of the Boomer Generation, I’ll confess that since returning to finish my degree, I have had many (many) new experiences—quite a number of them involving a computer and the Internet. Now, for most of you, these two interconnected communication systems are symbiotic with life, itself. Unfortunately, for many of my generation (I, myself, included), a computer was not a part of our birth appendages. In other words, my new “birth” of computer knowledge started about 3 years ago. At this point in time, I have successfully learned how to turn the “beast” on and even learned the name of various parts in a computer. Through classes such as this one, I am learning how to research topics on the Internet. Up to now the “web” has been a nebulous, mysterious realm where, with a few keystrokes, Wallah! Instant knowledge (or not—one has to be very careful, as I found out the hard way, that information, unless verified or found on a substantiated site such as educational one (“.edu” sites) may be falsely relayed or may be an opinion rather than fact or truth. This is especially true when one visits a Usenet site. On these sites it seems that “anything goes.” Rules of Nettiquette such as “#4- Respect other people’s time and bandwidth” and “#6- Share expert knowledge” seem to be ignored by many of the participants in the newsgroups that I visited. (Ross, 2005).
Though extremely entertaining—everyone can find a topic of interest—a person must be aware that not all information is fact, and indeed, most, if not all of the forums (the ones that I visited) are opinion-based. Some sites, such as “alt. support.depression.flame” (http://tinyurl.com/3drpx3), was an odd mix of facts and opinions; one post was about the business environment (http://tinyurl.com/345q4t); some were jokes (this was a blonde joke: http://tinyurl.com/39zjmw); to, well, questionably “tasteful” posts (Indian Actress Pictures hot sex )—I did not go into this post as I was not comfortable doing so—(and, no, I am NOT a prude, just not curious or interested in such posts, thank you very much). Some posts were conversational ramblings aimed at…? (Luna hates me—didn’t bother to investigate what that post even involved). It was amazing that almost every group that I visited had posts from people complaining that Rule #1- “Remember the Human” (Ross, 2005) was frequently broken. It is inconceivable that so many people would forget the Golden Rule of “do onto others…”
I did go on to one googlegroup site which I “searched” as “pets.” I then went to “rec.pets.dogs.behavior” (http://groups.google.com/group/rec.pets.dogs.behavior/topics?lnk=gschg). I logged in as “afriend4u” and posted a message about the problems my husband and I were having with our 14 year-old dog named Stoney. My post (“My Stoney”- http://tinyurl.com/38h5qc)
drew 7 messages; some were from sympathetic dog lovers; one was very informative and I will follow up with my vet on some meds that could alleviate the problems we are experiencing with Stoney (“FurPaw”); one message, I have yet to figure out (it starts out “HOWEDY afriend4u…)--I have no idea what that person is saying to me except to tell me to read a booklet that he has written. His name is Jerry Howe and I wrote back to thank him for his time and advice.
Another site that I investigated was the WELL community site. I found the introduction interesting as well as the forums that were offered (Pamela McCorduck, “The Edge of Chaos” http://tinyurl.com/2tmch9). I watched one of the videos “The Martian Report: Episode Two, Extraterrestrial Anthropologist Investigates Solar Energy”, Howard Rheingold’s Vlog. The jury is still out on that one, Ladies and Gentlemen. (http://vlog.rheingold.com/).
All and all, my experience with the Usenet was intriguing although I am not sure that I will be a “frequent flyer” there, at this point in my life; the lack of respect for others and the liberal topics of discussion are not to my liking although the outpouring of sympathy and the candor of some respondents were touching—I found them to be refreshing. Although newsgroups and googlegroups are not my favorite things to do at this time, I know that these sites are very popular with many people and I don't feel that they will decline or disappear. Because they are a pure form of "Freedom of Expression" and a great socialization tool (even though I prefer "face time"), I think that this method of communication will continue to evolve and develope into a primary factor of interconnectivity as the world becomes acclimated more and more toward a global environment.
Later, when I have time on my hands and don't have to worry about working (I am just starting a new business), I may link up to some sites and enjoy a leisure perusal of them but for the time being, I haven’t the time or the need to seek conversations with those I don’t already know well such as friends or family.
References:
Ross, S. T. (2005). The core rules of nettiquette.http://www.albion.com/netiquette/corerules.html
As an “Older-Something” person and an admitted member of the Boomer Generation, I’ll confess that since returning to finish my degree, I have had many (many) new experiences—quite a number of them involving a computer and the Internet. Now, for most of you, these two interconnected communication systems are symbiotic with life, itself. Unfortunately, for many of my generation (I, myself, included), a computer was not a part of our birth appendages. In other words, my new “birth” of computer knowledge started about 3 years ago. At this point in time, I have successfully learned how to turn the “beast” on and even learned the name of various parts in a computer. Through classes such as this one, I am learning how to research topics on the Internet. Up to now the “web” has been a nebulous, mysterious realm where, with a few keystrokes, Wallah! Instant knowledge (or not—one has to be very careful, as I found out the hard way, that information, unless verified or found on a substantiated site such as educational one (“.edu” sites) may be falsely relayed or may be an opinion rather than fact or truth. This is especially true when one visits a Usenet site. On these sites it seems that “anything goes.” Rules of Nettiquette such as “#4- Respect other people’s time and bandwidth” and “#6- Share expert knowledge” seem to be ignored by many of the participants in the newsgroups that I visited. (Ross, 2005).
Though extremely entertaining—everyone can find a topic of interest—a person must be aware that not all information is fact, and indeed, most, if not all of the forums (the ones that I visited) are opinion-based. Some sites, such as “alt. support.depression.flame” (http://tinyurl.com/3drpx3), was an odd mix of facts and opinions; one post was about the business environment (http://tinyurl.com/345q4t); some were jokes (this was a blonde joke: http://tinyurl.com/39zjmw); to, well, questionably “tasteful” posts (Indian Actress Pictures hot sex )—I did not go into this post as I was not comfortable doing so—(and, no, I am NOT a prude, just not curious or interested in such posts, thank you very much). Some posts were conversational ramblings aimed at…? (Luna hates me—didn’t bother to investigate what that post even involved). It was amazing that almost every group that I visited had posts from people complaining that Rule #1- “Remember the Human” (Ross, 2005) was frequently broken. It is inconceivable that so many people would forget the Golden Rule of “do onto others…”
I did go on to one googlegroup site which I “searched” as “pets.” I then went to “rec.pets.dogs.behavior” (http://groups.google.com/group/rec.pets.dogs.behavior/topics?lnk=gschg). I logged in as “afriend4u” and posted a message about the problems my husband and I were having with our 14 year-old dog named Stoney. My post (“My Stoney”- http://tinyurl.com/38h5qc)
drew 7 messages; some were from sympathetic dog lovers; one was very informative and I will follow up with my vet on some meds that could alleviate the problems we are experiencing with Stoney (“FurPaw”); one message, I have yet to figure out (it starts out “HOWEDY afriend4u…)--I have no idea what that person is saying to me except to tell me to read a booklet that he has written. His name is Jerry Howe and I wrote back to thank him for his time and advice.
Another site that I investigated was the WELL community site. I found the introduction interesting as well as the forums that were offered (Pamela McCorduck, “The Edge of Chaos” http://tinyurl.com/2tmch9). I watched one of the videos “The Martian Report: Episode Two, Extraterrestrial Anthropologist Investigates Solar Energy”, Howard Rheingold’s Vlog. The jury is still out on that one, Ladies and Gentlemen. (http://vlog.rheingold.com/).
All and all, my experience with the Usenet was intriguing although I am not sure that I will be a “frequent flyer” there, at this point in my life; the lack of respect for others and the liberal topics of discussion are not to my liking although the outpouring of sympathy and the candor of some respondents were touching—I found them to be refreshing. Although newsgroups and googlegroups are not my favorite things to do at this time, I know that these sites are very popular with many people and I don't feel that they will decline or disappear. Because they are a pure form of "Freedom of Expression" and a great socialization tool (even though I prefer "face time"), I think that this method of communication will continue to evolve and develope into a primary factor of interconnectivity as the world becomes acclimated more and more toward a global environment.
Later, when I have time on my hands and don't have to worry about working (I am just starting a new business), I may link up to some sites and enjoy a leisure perusal of them but for the time being, I haven’t the time or the need to seek conversations with those I don’t already know well such as friends or family.
References:
Ross, S. T. (2005). The core rules of nettiquette.http://www.albion.com/netiquette/corerules.html
Saturday, February 2, 2008
Nettiquette,you?
Being an "oldie but goodie" I have been having less than effective when learning how to use computers and the internet. When I found this class (through the enthusiastic accolade of some blessed new-found classmates), I signed up hoping to learn what most of you already know about computers and "the net." I found the article that Dr. Carmean kindly required her students to read about "Nettiquette" inspiring and eye-opening for me. Though quite well informed about social ettiquette in face-to-face situations, it had not occured to me that it would be any different in internet conversations. The "10 Commandments of Nettiquette" made sense to me and made me aware of things that I hadn't considered; #1-Remember the Human- called attention to the fact that when you make written comments, they may not be interepreted in the same way which they were intended. I can see where a written word or thought can be misinterepreted when "listener" can't see facial expressions or hear voice inflections. Where voice inflections can reveal a subtly-inferred joke, the written word might not reflect the humor. Some parts were a bit harder--#3- Know where you are (Goodness, I don't even know where I am in real time, sometimes!) but all in all, most made sense. "Be ethical." "Don't give an impression you wouldn't want people to hold of you in person," "Respect others' privacy", "Don't use offensive language", "#10- Be forgiving of others' mistakes" (One that I, personally, need to mark in my book), and my favorite--"#7- Keep flame wars under control"--I love that because I had no idea what a "flame" was and even less idea why a "flame war" needed to be kept under control but I was completely fascinated by the concept that something with a name such as "flame" and "flame war" existed that needed to be under control. It sounded devious--a "flame war"--woohoo, sounds kind of fun, huh? Not a good thing, though, if used the wrong way.
I did learn a great deal from this reading so a big "thank you" to the Good Doctor (Colleen). I enjoyed this. Please feel free to comment on my enthusiasm for this reading. Thanks for your input.
I did learn a great deal from this reading so a big "thank you" to the Good Doctor (Colleen). I enjoyed this. Please feel free to comment on my enthusiasm for this reading. Thanks for your input.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)